In the administration’s November 2003 Medicare reform bill, all the real benefits go to corporations and the health care industry at seniors' expense.
-
The legislation was drafted by an administration official while he was trying to get a lobbying job in the health care industry.
More ››
Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Thomas Scully was negotiating for private employment with five different health care firms while he was drafting the Medicare reform legislation. He was granted a special waiver of ethics rules by the administration. He left for private industry in December 2003. [Public Citizen]

-
The legislation erects new barriers to buying low-costing prescription drugs from Canada.
More ››
The legislation requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Tommy Thompson, to explicitly authorize pharmaceutical imports from Canada. He refuses to do so. [Center for American Progress ]
The administration recently appointed Mark McClellan as a replacement for Thomas Scully. As Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, McClellan led the charge against the importation of drugs from Canada. [Washington Post 2/20/04]

-
The legislation puts Medicare on the road to privatization, encouraging private insurers to cherry pick the healthiest seniors from Medicare.
More ››
The legislation provides a subsidy for private insurers to compete against Medicare. As private insurers enter the Medicare market, they will target their services at the healthiest, best off seniors. Removing their contributions from Medicare will further weaken its financial situation, and prompt more departures for private insurers, eventually leaving only the sickest of seniors in Medicare. [Families USA ]
When Congress approved the legislation, they were told that it would provide an appallingly high $14 billion subsidy to private insurers. [Campaign For America's Future] Based on information the administration suppressed, it now looks like the program will costs more than three times that amount. [New York Times, 3/20/04]

-
The few new benefits offered don’t kick in until 2006. Only a fake "Medicare discount card" will be offered immediately. The card will benefit a company run by a long-time Bush ally and campaign contributor. Bush was even one of the early investors in the company.
More ››
David Halbert founded the corporation that would become AdvancePCS in the early eighties, with a contribution from struggling businessman George W. Bush. He also assisted Bush with several illegitimate business deals while Bush was Director at Harken energy. George Bush would eventually realize more than 1 million dollars in capital gains on his Advance PCS investment. Halbert would be a significant Bush contributor in each of George W. Bush’s candidacies.
Halbert was tapped by the White House to create a "Medicare discount card" program that provides questionable benefits to seniors. Fortunately, his corporation, AdvancePCS, is one of the leading providers of prescription drug discount cards, and would be well positioned to reap an enormous profit from the program. [Center for American Progress; Boston Globe]

-
The reform benefits private insurers at the expense of rural Americans by using private insurers that under-serve rural America to provide the prescription drug benefits.
More ››

-
The administration lied about the reform’s costs and threatened to fire an administration employee who might have told the truth.
More ››
Based on a CBO report, the administration claimed that its Medicare reform plan would cost $400 billion over ten years, a low figure that was key to winning support for the plan from anti-deficit Republicans. [Seattle Times 3/12/04] Just weeks after the legislation passed, an Office of Management and Budget report put the actual cost at $534 billion. [OMB Watch 2/9/04 ] The administration feigned shock and surprise, but Medicare actuary Richard Foster claims that he was threatened "on White House instructions," probably from Doug Badger, the White House senior health policy analyst. [Washington Post 3/18/04; New York Times 3/18/04]
He prepared a cost estimate for the administration months before the vote, and forwarded it to the White House, [New York Times 3/20/04] but was threatened with firing by Bush’s Medicare chief, Thomas Scully, if he "let [his estimate] get out." [Center for American Progress; KaiserNetwork.org 1; KaiserNatwork.org 2]
The Dept. of Health and Human Services and the White House are passing the blame onto former administrator Thomas Scully, supporting an investigation into his activities. [Washington Times 3/17/04]
It now looks like the cost of the program will be more than double what it was originally forecast at. [New York Times 3/19/04]
Congress has launched an investigation of the treatment of Foster. [Time Magazine 3/9/04]

-
The administration’s allies abused congressional rules by leaving a House Vote open for hours as fierce lobbying continued. And they tried to bribe a Congressman to get the bill passed.
More ››
Congressman Nick Smith (R-MI) is retiring from the House in November, and his son was locked in a tight primary race to succeed him. Republican floor leaders offered substantial campaign contributions for his son’s campaign in return for Congressman Smith’s vote. They also threatened to support his son’s opponents if Congressman Smith voted against the legislation. [KaiserNetwork.org]
It is strong congressional convention that congressmen have fifteen minutes to vote after a vote is called. [
Campaign for America's Future; Office of Rep. Steny Hoyer]

-
The administration misled the American people in tax-payer funded advertisements, actually thinly veiled campaign ads. It sent out ads the GAO thinks might be "covert propaganda."
More ››
The Department of Health and Human Services initially produced 36 million misleading flyers [Flyer 1; Flyer 2] to send to current Medicare recipients, at a cost to taxpayers of $10 million. It soon after began spending millions of taxpayer dollars on a misleading television, radio and print advertising campaign, designed to "counteract Democratic criticism." The advertisements were placed by George Bush’s campaign media firm. On March 10, the GAO ruled that the advertisements were not illegal, though they "have notable omissions and other weaknesses." [Center for American Progress]
The GAO immediately reopened its investigation, though, when new Medicare ads were released that portray fake reporters asking questions about the program. [Kaiser Network; Village Voice]

-
Perhaps the most shocking thing about the bill is that it forbids Medicare from negotiating with drug companies for lower prices. The Medicare legislation actually forbids the governments from negotiating with drug makers for lower prices. And the legislation includes no cost controls for prescription drugs.
More ››
The legislation actually says: "In order to promote competition under this part and in carrying out this part, the Secretary (1) may not interfere with the negotiations between drug manufacturers and pharmacies and [prescription drug plan] sponsors; and (2) may not require a particular formulary or institute a price structure for the reimbursement of covered Part D drugs."
[Center for American Progress; Public Citizen]

-
The few new benefits are bizarrely structured in some cases they just don't make any sense at all.
More ››
Just try and make sense of this: Everybody pays a $420 annual premium and the first $250 in drug costs. The benefit pays 75% of the next $2000 dollars in drug costs, up to $2250 in expenses. It then provides nothing for the next $2850 in expenses, before covering 95% of all expenses above $5100. [Kaiser Family Foundation]

-
The reform tightens the income and assets test, making it harder for the non-destitute to get help, and increases prescription drug costs for people eligible for Medicaid.
More ››
|